[ILUG] Thoughts on a compile box

lbedford at wbtsystems.com lbedford at wbtsystems.com
Fri Apr 28 10:42:28 IST 2000


On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 10:36:57AM +0100, lbedford at wbtsystems.com wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 10:03:49AM +0100, John N S Gill wrote:
> >  
> > Is there a site anywhere that gives benchmark figures for different 
> > configurations?   It would be good to see performance figures for a 
> > suite of benchmark programs + maybe a few standard tests such as 
> > linux-kernel compile.  
> http://www.cpureview.com tended to be handy.. I dunno if they still 
> do the reviews of how fast their machines build the linux kernel.
> 
> I guess we could do a slightly unscientific test on this list.
> How long does it take people to build a bog standard SCSI + one
> network card 2.2 kernel? I know this is going to cause some
> differences as far as modules go, but it should be close enough.
> 
> There are a few people with Dual Celeron BP6 boards...
> 
> build with 
> time "make dep;make clean; make -j4 bzImage && make -j4 modules"
> 
> should work...
Actually, just looking, the Athlon 600 rebuilding 2.2.5 from RH 6
took him 3 mins (just for the bzImage)...

Now, IIRC my Celeron 450 took ~6 mins to rebuild a kernel
(I'm doing this from memory, so it may be wrong)... Kate, Phil,
Vin, how long does it take you to rebuild a kernel?

(for dual processor, make -j8 is empirically the fastest :))

L.
-- 
Liam Bedford						System Administrator
WBT Systems, Block 2, Harcourt Centre, Harcourt St.	01-4170153
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`




More information about the ILUG mailing list