[ILUG] [ getting OT] SMP & powersaving - java on a sparc
Shane Dempsey
sdempsey at tssg.wit.ie
Fri Jan 7 11:39:41 GMT 2000
Ah , its all clear now.
Any chance of the next INTEL processors being more
SMP friendly ? Seems a shame to make the same mistakes
again and again ...
Also could anyone confirm / refute that the latest SPARCs
have circuits which act like JVM's ( not fully but enough that bytecode on
a SPARC is going to be close to native code) I read this somewhere but I
just
can't remember the source.
BTW xena ? >:-))
...shane
----- Original Message -----
From: John P. Looney <jplooney-ilug at online.ie>
To: <ilug at linux.ie>
Sent: 07 January 2000 08:53
Subject: Re: [ILUG] SMP & powersaving
>
> I thought they re-wrote the book for SMP systems on Intel. That's why it
> rocks so much :)
>
> xena [0] cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 4186169 4160816 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 72686 72444 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
> 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge acpi
> 12: 460479 460847 IO-APIC-edge PS/2 Mouse
> 13: 1 0 XT-PIC fpu
> 15: 83377 82605 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> 16: 462957 464316 IO-APIC-level es1371
> 18: 531573 531831 IO-APIC-level ide2, eth0
> NMI: 8346927 8346927
> LOC: 8345909 8345910
> ERR: 1
>
> Kick ass. Loads of interrupts, and loads of space!
More information about the ILUG
mailing list