[ILUG] RMS: KDE in violation of GPL
jimregan at lit.compsoc.com
Wed Sep 6 14:06:12 IST 2000
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Ruairi Newman wrote:
) Thanks Paul. I see what you mean and on reflection I was wrong.
) However this opens up a new question: As the GPL is the only license
) included for the majority of the KDE code, and KDE is in violation of
) it, then isn't KDE as a whole potentially unlicensed?
That's what RMS's statement was about - if all authors of violated code
grant forgiveness, then KDE is in the clear.
"The Information Superhighway made it possible for the average person
to find out what some nerd thinks about Star Trek"
More information about the ILUG