[ILUG] OT But esat unlimited has been scrapped
Thomas Bridge
tbridge at vianetworks.ie
Mon Mar 26 15:59:23 IST 2001
At 14:57 26/03/2001 +0100, you wrote:
> >>>>> "JM" == Justin Mason <jm at jmason.org> writes:
>
> JM> Paul J Collins said:
>
> >> That said, 75 a month for an always-on connection would still
> >> save me money, especially since I could ditch my Web hosting
> >> provider (assuming they assign static IPs). I guess I'm in.
>
> JM> Unfortunately, my guess is that static IPs, and maybe even the
> JM> idea of "running servers", will not be permitted.
>
>Static IPs I can (nearly) do without, but I am going to want to run
>some servers.
Which means you will almost certainly need to pay more money again.
I've no idea how Eircom will do it here, but it should be noted that there
is a contention ratio between you and the ISP in the UK with DSL (for home
users, normally 1:50). So if you're on an ISP with lots of RedHat users
and they are all downloading the newest ISO image, you could well find that
normal dialup is faster.
T.
More information about the ILUG
mailing list