[ILUG] Class C Addresses
paulj at alphyra.ie
Wed Nov 7 17:10:21 GMT 2001
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Treanor, Ciaran wrote:
> > nope.
> Could you give more detail. I'm honestly curious about this.
NAT can be a pain in the backside. try debugging network problems when
there's a NAT machine in the middle. (now was that /my/ packet?
NAT often requires knowledge of user protocol in order to function,
NAT only works one way. (breaks peer to peer addressing).
i'm sure there's plenty more reasons, but i just cant think of them. i
dont think NAT is /bad/, i just think it is a workaround.
globally unique addrs, eg with IPv6:
- disadvantages none
- advantages over 'global unique addresses' none
- disadvantages some
so where's the argument?
> Sorry to be pedantic, but the point of *TCP* is to provide end-to-end
ok... i've got a web server running on my desktop,
dunlop.dub.ie.alphyra.com. connect to it. (ok you cant resolve the
adderss, but even you could, it wouldnt help).
> Can't argue with that, but what percentage of people out there can
> live perfectly happily with NAT?
so when everyone is using IPv6, they should still use NAT?
> Ciaran T
More information about the ILUG