[ILUG] Class C Addresses
Thomas Bridge
tbridge at vianetworks.ie
Wed Nov 7 17:32:55 GMT 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 17:14 07/11/2001 +0000, John P. Looney wrote:
> > NAT:
> > - advantages over 'global unique addresses' none
> > - disadvantages some
> - gives people the impression they don't need a firewall
Failure to understand the limitations of a technology is hardly an argument
against deploying it. You shouldn't deploy any technology unless you
understand what you're supposed to be doing.
> If programmers would just get a list of all IPs associated with a
>hostname, try the first, attempt to connect, and if that failed inside of
>a second or three, try the second etc. - everything would be rosy. But no.
>People are lazy. So, you have to do NAT etc. to get around it. It's a
>crazy world.
It seems to me you're arguing against a multilayered networking model.
In any case, the delays inherent in trying up to 10 TCP connections before
one succeeds may be unacceptable under certain conditions - in this case,
you still need Load Balancing to speed things up.
T.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBO+lv2b6WYZbx1eG3EQJrdQCg5I2AoES65TyOzTaqV/e7D47aM9sAoP29
0aLNxT2FQyyGlGOKMtF5aOoZ
=JIrh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the ILUG
mailing list