[ILUG] NAT and NAF differences
uno at eircom.net
Fri Nov 9 21:55:39 GMT 2001
Fergal Daly wrote:
> Sounds to me like ACC's version of NAT was a bit crap and only handled 1
> host, so when they figured out how to do more than 1 they called it something
> else so they could charge for an upgrade,
Thanks Fergal, this sounds like the perfect explanation to me.
"make them think they are getting something new and innovative....
market it well and charge them for the upgrade"
I wonder where ACC learned that...
Sounds like some other large companies we know.
(Actually sounds like EVERY large company I know)
Regards to all for the info (re-education)
More information about the ILUG