[ILUG] NAT and NAF differences

[Petra]

Fergal Daly wrote:
> 
> Sounds to me like ACC's version of NAT was a bit crap and only handled 1
> host, so when they figured out how to do more than 1 they called it something
> else so they could charge for an upgrade,
> 
Thanks Fergal, this sounds like the perfect explanation to me.

"make them think they are getting something new and innovative....
 market it well and charge them for the upgrade"

I wonder where ACC learned that...

Sounds like some other large companies we know.
(Actually sounds like EVERY large company I know)

Regards to all for the info (re-education)

Pete.