[ILUG] emacs and w3
kevin+dated+1034106883.c9a552 at ie.suberic.net
Thu Oct 3 20:55:03 IST 2002
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 01:54:38PM +0100, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> Ar an 2u la de mi 10, scriobh Darragh :
wow, you'd almost think it was the irish linux users group. oh... wait...
> > w3-fetch its says no match found.
> Hmm. I'm a heavy XEmacs user, but I really really dislike W3. There
> are some things that really didn't need to be written in Emacs Lisp,
> and a web browser is one of them. Would you write one in Perl?
hasn't that been done? i could have sworn there were a few but i only
can quickly find tkweb. i thought there was one that started with "a."
but can't find it.
but yeah, i've used both tkweb and w3-mode, but they're kinda silly.
then again i last used w3-mode back in 1995 or 1996 so maybe it's much
better. combined with something like webdav i could see it being a neat
way to edit html or even some cgi stuff.
obviously not as good as vi, yadda, yadda. :)
kevin, who didn't want to scare anyone with emacs compliments...
kevin at ie.suberic.net "How do we know Saddam has weapons of mass
fork()'ed on 37058400 destruction? We looked at the receipt."
meatspace place: home --Bill Hicks
More information about the ILUG