On Friday 16 April 2004, feargal at helgrim.com (Feargal Reilly) wrote: >> I'm curious as to why you'd use a method which is slower and more error prone >> than good old sed? > >I wouldn't - I just couldn't be bothered giving an example of a more complex change. Fair enough - I wouldn't use sed myself for a complex change - that'd be perl's job. Niall