[ILUG] OT Re: Eircom -v- IOL, or just Eircom practicing the best of
spam management, and blacklisting themselves.
Frank Murphy
lists2004 at utvinternet.com
Tue Apr 27 13:42:26 IST 2004
At 13:20 27/04/2004, Enda wrote:
>Personally it makes me re-think my own blacklist strategy. False positive
>blocking is acceptable at a corporate domain level where the organisation is
>responsible for its own destiny, but when it comes down to an ISP being the
>domain for many multiples of corporate entities, all suffering the same
>fate, not a good option (commercially).
>
>Spamcop doesn't block ISP's,
what it will do is place a particular mailserver on its bl.spamcop.net,
if it gets enough reports of spam, not bounces even fake ones or virii,
or recently Mailing-List spam (unless your the admin for the list.)
It is them up to server admins to make use of the lists or not.
+ if spam is reported to an ISP mail-admin who does nothing,
they may well find themselves considered a spam friendly ISP,
and be blocked by other ISP's
All entries are auto. de-listed 48hrs after the last spam report for a
particular mail-server.
Spamcop "reportees" will lose their reporting service for will nilly reporting.
Frank
(spamcop user)
More information about the ILUG
mailing list