[ILUG] SUMMARY: SuSE 9.2 Pro

[Niall O Broin]

On 19 Nov 2004, at 10:16, Brendan Kehoe wrote:

> It was encouraging to hear Niall's own success with 9.2, since that at 
> least
> qualified it to me as likely to be nice and stable.

Yes - well - I since installed it on another box as an upgrade from 
9.1. That appeared to work reasonably well - at least, there were no 
complaints during the install process. However, I have observed two 
issues so far:

1) The KDM login banner wasn't changed so it still said SuSE Linux 9.1 
- yes, this IS trivial.

2) subfs doesn't work. This is not quite so trivial, and I have 
submitted an installation support request to SuSE about it (I have a 
SuSE Pro. subscription which includes install support and I never use 
it, so I figured I might as well). It doesn't load the subfs, which I'd 
imagine is a bit of a sine qua non, but even with that loaded, it still 
doesn't work.


Niall