[ILUG] AGM 2004

[Niall O Broin]

On 19 Oct 2004, at 00:22, Thomas Bridge wrote:

> IANAL, but I think the Supreme Court in some jurisdictions (for example
> the US) will take into consideration what was meant by the author of 
> the
> relevant piece of the constitution.

Ah yes, but as I said, a supreme court is a luxury we don't possess :-)

> The established precedent based on last years AGM was that the three
> counted towards the 5%.

Hmm - I think at last year's AGM we counted the cat, and assorted 
invertebrates.


Niall