[ILUG] The roots of: is libxml(2) insecure?

[Aidan Delaney]

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:10 +0100, Laur Ivan wrote:
> ..I should explain where I'm coming from: I'm writing a wireless configuration 
> daemon with the following capabilities:
>  - support for multiple APs
>  - automatic detection of in-range APs and network reconfiguration
>  - capability of automatic reconfig of the network (transparently ?) in 
> certain situations (i.e. laptop moved, AP went down etc.)
>  - capability to connect to "non-preferred" (?) APs (e.g. once off cafes)
This is exactly what the Gnome NetworkManager does.  It utilises d-bus
and has some nice graphical stuff.  I've never had to look at the config
file, which is a good thing IMHO.
-- 
Aidan Delaney   email: adelaney at cs.may.ie
                web:   http://www.cs.may.ie/~adelaney
                gpg:   http://www.cs.may.ie/~adelaney/public_key.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/attachments/20041029/afb6258f/attachment.pgp