[ILUG] SuSE redistribution

[Liam Bedford]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rick Moen wrote:
| Quoting Michael Conry (michael.conry at gmail.com):
|
|
|>But I have some sympathy with Rory's points too regarding the
|>reasonableness of accepting SuSE's licence at face value, and in good
|>faith.
|
|
| I haven't actually yet seen that licence.  I note that, as quoted, it
| refers to permissions granted to capital-s "Software", that term
| presumably defined by Novell earlier in the document as referring to
| some particular property in the usual lawyerly fashion.  In a couple of
| days, I expect to have a set of the five CDs, and look forward to seeing
| what that and other relevant contents say in their natural context.
|

[snip]

I suggest, seeing as this conversation is getting really really boring,
that you contact Opera, Real, et al, and communicate to them the fact
that Novell is violating their license/copyright. If they then decide to
sue Novell, we know that you're right. If however they don't, we know
that Novell was correct. In both cases, it's much quieter for us.

L.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCbMJBM3UzH+ohibARAt2DAJ9az6EzY8YSJAVmLwU1LPkYT1ow9wCfSxES
EEQvaCT2KpDKT6gpdjYl/Eo=
=2qCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----