[ILUG] NBD's, lihux-HA, GFS/GNBD vs. DRBD/heartbeat

[John Moylan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I hope that that was down to the fact that 2.4 < 2.4.19 was crud. Has
anyone used DRBD RAID1 on more recent kernels? OR EVMS Clustering, or GFS?

J

John P. Looney wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 02:51:09PM +0000, John Moylan mentioned:
|
|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|>Hash: SHA1
|>
|>Really? do you have any references? Would this have been with present
|>Kernels or with eg 2.2?
|
|
|  Last time I used it was in Antefacto, so that's over two years ago. I
| think with 2.4.12 or something. It would fall over & crash the machine
| every few hours.
|
|  I thought it'd be a cool idea to have five machines export a few gigs of
| storage out through NBD, then remount it back RAID5. Alas, it'd crash in
| seconds when you did that.
|
|  I did some more playing, but gave up on it as a "nice idea, needs a lot
| of work".
|
| john
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCIz37HgDLUzVQ7OARAgaGAKCgfc2N6IcSWtAsUi5FOQ4N9A3iSgCeOgF6
dobR6bZTxsX7hVRkn/gziBM=3D
=3DGkSY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

***************************************************************************=
***
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privilege=
d.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone el=
se
is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in relian=
ce
on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Please note that emails to, from and within RTE may be subject to the Freed=
om
of Information Act 1997 and may be liable to disclosure.
***************************************************************************=
***