[ILUG] gcc and printf style functions

[Paul Jakma]

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Brian Foster wrote:

>   - is it possible, without changing gcc, to remove
>     or redefine some of the % codes it does know?
>
>   - if it is possible to add remove or change % codes,
>     can that be concurrently used with the UN-altered
>     definitions for "real" printf(3)?

I'd love to know this too.

A lot of "platforms" lack %z for size_t, which makes it quite 
difficult to avoid warnings from compiler for anything which tries to 
printf a size_t.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune: