[ILUG] Re: ILUG sends s/w patents briefing document to Irish MEPs
Joseph Kiniry
kiniry at acm.org
Tue Mar 22 09:47:33 GMT 2005
Hi Niall, Paul, et al,
On 21 Mar, 2005, at 23:56, Niall O Broin wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2005, at 23:36, Joseph Kiniry wrote:
>
>> On 21 Mar, 2005, at 21:03, Paul O'Malley wrote:
>>> Another aside :) My previous TCP/IP comment was referring to the
>>> fact that without a common unowned intercommunication standard the
>>> net would not have happened. I omitted the information about Linux
>>> and other OSS platforms allowed the commercial event (Internet
>>> growth) that disrupted communications so much that we now look at a
>>> totally different communications landscape from that of 10 years
>>> ago.
>>
>> But TCP/IP *did* happen without FOSS. All the original
>> implementations predate the GNU Project by over 15 years, for
>> example.
>
> Paul didn't mention FOSS in the context of TCP/IP. He said "a common
> unowned intercommunication standard" was essential to the genesis of
> the net. Although the original standards were owned (I think DoD money
> paid for them) they were free for all to use, and so they were very
> similar in their availability to open source software today, and that
> freedom was important to their wide adoption.
My apologies---I misinterpreted the context of the original TCP/IP
mention.
I like this list because if I delay in responding to a point long
enough (i.e., seemingly, hours) someone else will do the leg-work for
me (see Rick's response on this point).
> The only comparable protocol (and in many ways of course it's NOT
> comparable, but it was also very widely used) that springs to mind was
> IPX but it was an owned protocol, and was used only by one company, or
> to interwork with that company's products. I imagine there are many
> readers of this list don't even know what IPX is.
Heh. Anyone remember when early multiplayer-games simply didn't
support TCP/IP? :)
Joe
More information about the ILUG
mailing list