[ILUG] SSH bandwidth usage.

[fuzzbucket]

Niall O Broin wrote:
> 
> ssh + mutt would be a very low user of bandwidth compared to web 
> browsing, or email with big attachments. However, the term "network 
> usage policy" generally refers to what the network is being used for,
>  rather than how much of it you use. You might find that those nasty 
> Linux packets will be banned :-)
> 

You /could/ take the view that if there are no electronic blocks in
place then access is fair game.

...not that I would ever suggest you... Oh, hell - who am I kidding? :)

It's possible to run a proxy locally that makes all traffic look like an
Internet Explorer session.

...not that I would ever suggest you... Oh, hell - who am I kidding? :)

-- 
ICQ:139064407 Jabber:fuzzbucket at jabber.org Yahoo:rapidyokes