[ILUG] The old CD thread again {RHEL this time}

[Sean O Sullivan]

conor at discuskeeping.com wrote:
>>> It is *not* a licence to run the code, you have that the moment you
>>> have the CD by virtue of the GPL, as well as ability to freely
>>> distribute the CD (presuming of course, those two RPMs were removed
>>> from the CD before copying).
>>
>>
>> Agreed.
> 
> 
> Yo yo, check it out.
> I found references to redhat in other packages.
> 
> example is squirrelmail.
> I have (had) centos4, and use(d) squirrelmail on my old domain.
> the front page clearly mentions "provided by Redhat" or something like 
> that.
> 
> I remember seeeing redhat is other places too, surely they should be 
> removed, or
> do those things not count? I'm asking as I do not know.

http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=9