[ILUG] null client configuration for sendmail

[Walter Faleiro]

Hi Badger,
Nothing much in the file. Not sure where the working info is
different.Theexact same file is placed on mankind. The only difference
is splendor does
not have a submit.mc and the sendmail.cf is under /etc/ and not under
/etc/mail.
The entries worth mentioning in sendmil.cf of splendor are


Cwsplendor splendor.example.com
DSserver02.example.com
DHexample.com
DMexample.com

Regards,
--Walter


Regards,
--Walter.

divert(-1)dnl
dnl #
dnl # This is the sendmail macro config file for m4. If you make changes to
dnl # /etc/mail/sendmail.mc, you will need to regenerate the
dnl # /etc/mail/sendmail.cf file by confirming that the sendmail-cf package
is
dnl # installed and then performing a
dnl #
dnl #     make -C /etc/mail
dnl #
include(`/usr/share/sendmail-cf/m4/cf.m4')dnl
VERSIONID(` Nullclient for Linux')dnl
OSTYPE(`linux')dnl
DOMAIN(`generic')dnl
FEATURE(`nullclient',`server02.example.com')dnl
undefine(`ALIAS_FILE')dnl


On 8/31/06, Badger <badger at scattermail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:41:11AM +0530, Walter Faleiro wrote:
> > Hi Badger,
> > There are linux systems working fine with the configuration just fine. I
> am
> > trying to add a few more. But unfortunately I cannot see a correlation
> > between the steps you provided and the working configuration. As I said
> it
> > works fine from the host splendor, which is linux 7.2.
> >
> >
> > Following is the output from splendor that is working fine
> >
> > mail -v walter
> > Subject: test mail
> > .
> > Cc:
> > Null message body; hope that's ok
> > walter... Connecting to server02.example.com. via relay...
> > 220 server02.example.com Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version:
> > 6.0.3790.1830 ready at  Wed, 30 Aug 2006 12:11:01 -0700
> > >>>EHLO splendor.example.com
> > 250-server02.example.com Hello [192.168.1.208]
> > 250-TURN
> > 250-SIZE
> > 250-ETRN
> > 250-PIPELINING
> > 250-DSN
> > 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES
> > 250-8bitmime
> > 250-BINARYMIME
> > 250-CHUNKING
> > 250-VRFY
> > 250-X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
> > 250-X-EXPS=LOGIN
> > 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM LOGIN
> > 250-AUTH=LOGIN
> > 250-X-LINK2STATE
> > 250-XEXCH50
> > 250 OK
> > >>>MAIL From:<root at splendor.example.com> SIZE=31 AUTH=
> > root at splendor.example.com
> > 250 2.1.0 root at splendor.example.com....Sender OK
> > >>>RCPT To:<walter at example.com>
> > 250 2.1.5 walter at example.com
> > >>>DATA
> > 354 Start mail input; end with <CRLF>.<CRLF>
> > >>>.
> > 250 2.6.0  <200608301911.k7UJB1030730 at splendor.example.com> Queued mail
> for
> > delivery
> > walter... Sent ( <200608301911.k7UJB1030730 at splendor.example.com> Queued
> > mail for delivery)
> > Closing connection to server02.example.com.
> > >>>QUIT
> > 221 2.0.0 server02.example.com Service closing transmission channel
> >
>
> Walter, you gotta come part-way to meet me here. I need to see to output
> of the configuration that we are building - the one that's failing, not
> the one that is working. I'm testing things out on my machine as we go
> and it's all working fine, so if something is not working for you,
> you've got to say "this isn't working" and show me some output if you can.
>
> >
> > Are there any other files other than sendmail.mc, .cf, submit.cf and
> aliases
> > that I should look into?
> >
>
> Yes, as I suggested earlier, you should compare the /etc/mail/submit.mc
> files on mankind with those on splendor.
>
> The submit.mc on splendor could very well hold the answer that you are
> looking for. I hadn't really thought about it, but there's probably no
> reason that you couldn't remap the hostname part through that. This
> would eliminate that .mailrc kludge that I mentioned before. Post that
> configuration here if you can.
>
>
> --
> Irish Linux Users' Group mailing list
> About this list : http://mail.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug
> Who we are : http://www.linux.ie/
> Where we are : http://www.linux.ie/map/
>