[ILUG] Slightly OT: Suggestions for performance testing PHP
website
Phil Bradley
philb at vodafone.ie
Mon Dec 15 16:36:26 GMT 2008
Hi all,
I just noticed a few replies had come in after I thought the thread had
finished, sorry if it looked like I was ignoring these posts.
Firstly, for everyone who pitched in with suggestions, thank you very
much. <plug>The site is now live and is at http://www.icty.org. I can't
claim this was all my own work but I provided the development services
required</plug>.
It's still a little sluggish at approx 25 requests/second (even with
XCache enabled) but good enough for the moment. I'll have a look at
wincachegrind, as per David's suggestion. Since none of the included
files actually *do* anything apart from define classes and functions, it
looks like this is just a case of the server just not being very fast
(it's running in a VM which might be under resourced).
Philip: I'll probably revisit JMeter, it may have just been a mental
block but I wasn't confident that I understood what it was reporting.
The ApacheBench report seemed to make more sense and, while less capable
than JMeter, it sufficed for a simple comparative benchmark. Thanks for
the suggestion though.
Cheers all,
-Phil
PhilipQuinlan wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> not wanting to start a row over our favourite tools, but in what way
> did JMeter fail to do what you want, it should be perfect for what you
> describe.
>
> Build individual application function tests, string them together
> randomly, top and tail with login and logout then run n threads.
>
> It sounds ideal for your requirements.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 3660 (20081203) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
More information about the ILUG
mailing list