intactsoftware.local email is *still* screwed up (was Re: [ILUG] Democrats Abroad)

[Brendan Kehoe]

> PS  Any chance Eircom will fix their email? I got yet another bounce
> in an ILUG reply that included watty at eircom.net
>   

As Justin Mason pointed out on January 2nd., this isn't caused by Eircom:

> *Justin Mason* jm at jmason.org
> <mailto:ilug%40linux.ie?Subject=intactsoftware.local%20email%20screwed%20up%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BILUG%5D%20Eircom%20email%0A%09screwed%20up%3F%29&In-Reply-To=4773AD4A.30203%40sweetnam.eu>
> /Wed Jan 2 10:57:47 GMT 2008/
>
>     * Previous message: [ILUG] Eircom email screwed up?
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/096163.html>
>     * Next message: [ILUG] Symbolic Linking
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/096170.html>
>     * *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/date.html#96165>
>       [ thread ]
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/thread.html#96165>
>       [ subject ]
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/subject.html#96165>
>       [ author ]
>       <http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2008-January/author.html#96165>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> It looks like, if a mail is sent to ILUG and cc'd to an
> @eircom.net address (or vice versa), an ILUG subscriber at intactsoftware
> receives a copy, and their MSExchange MTA is configured (brokenly) to
> attempt to deliver @eircom.net addresses locally.   Since the eircom.net
> address doesn't exist locally, that generates an "undeliverable"
> notification error to the original sender.