[ILUG] cifs Fedora-8-xfce mounting CentOS5 Shares Problem Solved
mariconor at gmail.com
Sun Jan 13 12:09:06 GMT 2008
On 12 Jan 2008, at 22:23, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Conor Wynne wrote:
>> Its essentially the same thing, Server Message Block (Where SAMBA
>> gets its name)
>> Newer versions of the same stack -- different names and that about
>> it. Think SMB1 and SMB2
>> At around the time when Sun Microsystems announced WebNFS <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebNFS
>> >  <http://www.sun.com/software/webnfs/overview.xml>, Microsoft
>> launched an initiative in 1996 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996>
>> to rename SMB to *Common Internet File System* (*CIFS)*
> Could NFS work as a replacement for CIFS\Samba, some of the children
> won't use the linux,
> my eldest girl is willing to give it a go, as long as her Mobile and
> Digital camera can work from it.
Yes and No. For linux/UNIX/MAC clients, then yes it can, it can also
even for windows via MicroSoft's
SFU package, but SFU can be tricky to implement, at least for a server
-- mappings is a pain in AD.
If your DNS server is not 100%, then its perf will suck as well. But
this is another discussion for windows servers and linux/UNIX clients.
So yes and no is your answer. I would stick with samba for windows
clients, and either samba or NFS for linux.
You can use both actually, the same share can be exported as NFS or
More information about the ILUG