[ILUG] Solved - [Q] USB/udev - how to debug rules not(?) being run?
Brian Foster
blf at utvinternet.ie
Wed Jan 16 19:28:15 GMT 2008
| Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:27:04 +0100
| From: Brian Foster <blf at utvinternet.ie>
|[ ... ]
| I'm struggling with the installation of some
| specialist USB kit; in particular of an FS²
| (First Silicon Systems) JTAG Probe (Linux host
| software 2.1.8.8) on Kubuntu 7.10 (64-bit).
|
| there seem to be two issues:
|
| 1st, the Probe does not seem to be coming to
| life [ ... ]
|
| 2nd, the FS² software installation expected
| `hotplug'(/`usbfs'?), whilst I'm using
| `udev' [ ... ]
|
| using `udevmonitor' I can see the Probe being
| detected when I plug it in [ ... but the FS²
| `udev' rules are not being used ... ].
|
| in [other] words, "an" USB unit is being detected,
| and has the right ID to match the FS² udev rules,
| but those rules do not seem to be run.
|
| the logfiles do not seem to contain anything
| interesting.
|
| any suggestions or ideas on how I can obtain a
| better idea what is / isn't happening?
solved (and, even better, understood!).
1st, I had to convince myself the FS² rules were
really being read/accepted by udevd(8). this was
done by deliberately inserting a bogus FOO="bar"
field in the rules. `udevd' logged that it had
no idea what `FOO' was. Ok, so it is being read.
remove the bogus field and proceed.
2nd, to try and get a handle on whether or not the
rules were really being run, I modified the PROGRAM
or RUN fields' value to be (in essence):
/bin/sh -c 'exec 2>>/tmp/FS2; set -x; ...'
where the «...» was the original contents of the RUN
or PROGRAM field. the above should log the running
of «...» in the file /tmp/FS2. but that file was
never created, proving the rules really were not
being run.
(the “sh -c '...'” bracketing was because the man
page was unclear whether or not the shell was used,
and I did not feel like solving that minor mystery.)
why not? I had to guess: I observed that the FS²
rules used a SUBSYSTEM of “usb_device”, which (from
the other files) seemed to be obsolete. hum .... I
took a leap and changed that to the “usb” SUBSYSTEM.
bingo! the /tmp/FS2 file was created, and showed
some of the FS² rules were working, and some weren't.
3rd, RFTM (again!). this time, I notice that if a
rule had specified a NAME, any subsequent matching
rule which also did would be ignored. ah! the FS²
rules were NAMEing nodes, and the generic files,
run earlier, were also .... so some rewriting
(and, as it happens, simplification), produced a
set of working rules (for the original “usb_device”
SUBSYSTEM, which seems to better match the original
intent).
so that's “How to Debug ...” in this case.
now the problem is the software downloaded to the
embedded development board connected to the FS²
Probe seems to be doing fsck all ..... *sigh*!
cheers!
-blf-
p.s. there were not, b.t.w., two separate issues;
they turned out to be the same thing. the FS²
Probe does not come to life until the 1st(?)
rule is run, which downloads some software
(using `fxload').
--
“How many surrealists does it take to | Brian Foster
change a lightbulb? Three. One calms | somewhere in south of France
the warthog, and two fill the bathtub | Stop E$$o (ExxonMobile)!
with brightly-coloured machine tools.” | http://www.stopesso.com
More information about the ILUG
mailing list