[ILUG] Routing problem
Kevin Philp
lists at cybercolloids.net
Mon Mar 2 11:57:42 GMT 2009
Kieran Murphy wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Kevin Philp <lists at cybercolloids.net
> <mailto:lists at cybercolloids.net>> wrote:
>
> John Allen wrote:
>
> Kevin wrote:
>
> John Allen wrote:
>
> Kevin wrote:
>
> I am having problems with my Debian/Lenny
> firewall/routing box. The internet connection runs
> really, really slow. It does work - but its very slow.
>
> My internal lan is 192.168.100.*
> My DSL router is 192.168.1.254
> My external nic (wireless) is 192.168.1.1
> My internal nic is 192.168.100.1
>
> I checked the routing table:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask
> Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 192.168.100.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
> 0 0 0 eth0
> 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
> 0 0 0 wlan0
> default 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG
> 0 0 0 wlan0
>
> Your default route is the wireless connection, I'd
> guess the wireless connection is the issue.
>
>
> Ifconfig/iwconfig look OK. However if I run
> traceroute I get some odd results:
>
> traceroute to an internal LAN address completes in
> 1 hop
>
> traceroute to the DSL router 192.168.1.254 from
> the firewall box fails after about 30 hops - it
> should be 1 hop.
>
> Running tracepath on the DSL box gives me:
>
> server:/home/kevinphilp# tracepath 192.168.1.254
> 1: 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)
> 1.218ms pmtu 1500
> 1: no reply
> 2: no reply
>
> On google I get the same
> server:/home/kevinphilp# tracepath www.google.com
> <http://www.google.com>
> 1: 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)
> 0.950ms pmtu 1500
> 1: no reply
> 2: no reply
>
> Any thoughts welcome
>
> Kevin.
>
>
> There does seem to be something wrong with it - the signal
> quality is claims to get from the access point is about
> 50% - which is weak considering the access point is about
> 15 feet away. Also it constantly backs off the rate from
> 54M down to 1M - my guess is either the wireless card or
> the router are decrepit - does that sound reasonable?
>
> I've had a similar problem with my Laptop (Ubuntu Intrepid),
> was getting 1M all the time until very recently, when some
> kernel update fixed it. Still rarely get 54Mbps, but between
> 24 and 36.
>
> I'd direct wire the Deb box to the DSL modem/router (thats
> what I've done), so at least the LAN is fast.
>
>
> I had the box hard wired before and that was fine - but the family
> don't like ethernet cables run across hallways! I am surprised I
> got away with it as long as I did.
>
> I am looking into the driver issue.
>
> lspci tells me :
> 00:12.0 Network controller: RaLink RT2500 802.11g Cardbus/mini-PCI
> (rev 01)
>
> Actually its a rt2560F chip on an Edimax EW-7128g card
>
> lsmod tells me I have the following installed
>
> rt2500pci 17152 0
> rt2x00pci 7680 1 rt2500pci
> rt2x00lib 22272 2 rt2500pci,rt2x00pci
>
> My kernel is
> Linux server 2.6.26-1-486 #1 Sat Jan 10 17:46:23 UTC 2009 i586
> GNU/Linux
>
> So it looks like we have the right driver running.
>
> I actually checked on a similar machine with a lan connection and
> I get the same "no reply" from tracepath - so I guess that's
> actually not telling me anything. I seem to have got it running
> stably at 2M - I will tweak it up slowly and see what happens.
>
>
> Are you 100% Certain that your Wireless connection is working?
> You mention that you're using WPA. Perhaps your wpa_supplicant isn't
> doing what its supposed to be doing.
> Try testing this without WPA.
>
> Regards,
> Kieran..
>
100% sure - the only route to the internet is via the wireless nic on
the router box - the lan cable has been removed - the hallway is clear.
It does work - I can browse the internet, run aptitude update - but the
connection is just slow. I had a similar problem a while back when one
of the telephone filters was removed and connection speeds dropped by
about 10 fold.
I ran a test downloading a large file from heanet. On my Eircom
connection at work I got full speed ~270k at home it levelled out at 70k
- so I have a connection, its just poor. That was the same file from the
same server downloaded just a few minutes apart.
I have actually just read an article on cordless phones causing problems
- and we have just got some new cordless phones!! I will report back on
what I find.
Kevin.
More information about the ILUG
mailing list