[ILUG] Government use of OSS
Cian Brennan
lil_cain at redbrick.dcu.ie
Thu Mar 19 11:55:21 GMT 2009
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 08:56:16AM +0000, Braun Brelin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Lisa Muir <34.24.34 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Gerard Cunningham <lists at faduda.net>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Anyone got an estimate of how much the government might save
> > >> if it went over to open source software?
> > >
> > > On a not quite related topic, does anyone here know anything about the
> > > Garda PULSE system. I'm assuming its not open source, and since
> > > Accenture are the main providors/maintainers I can find from a google
> > > search, I'm guessing it's custom built. The only cost figures I can find
> > > is from a PQ a few years ago giving an annual cost of 12Million. I'm
> > > wondering how comparable this (and other computing needs of the force,
> > > desktops, portables) would be to the French experience.
> >
> > I was under the impression that PULSE was provided by Esat telecom as
> > part of a deal where Esat got to use every garda station as a mobile
> > phone tower. I do recall seeing the familiar solaris screensaver
> > running at the local barracks one day (like 9 years ago), which would
> > hint at solaris x86. I also vaguely recall the deal going pear shaped
> > which might explain why there is talk here of VB4 and Microsoft
> > involvement.
>
>
>
> That isn't correct. ESAT had nothing to do with PULSE. Also, unless
> things have radically changed, the Gardai don't use Open Solaris.
>
> Braun
>
I don't think OpenSolaris was implied at all, rather it's proprietary cousin.
>
> >
> >
> > So... in your digging, you could well find that there were limited
> > hardware costs, and an original software system funded by a telecoms
> > third party, with the software system being replaced at a later stage
> > at the cost of the taxpayer. In such deals where windows would replace
> > a non windows solution, you could well expect extremely heavily
> > discounted microsoft licences for OS software, maybe even free, just
> > to kill oposing OS vendors case studies and replace them with an MS
> > case study.
> >
> > I expect things have moved on significantly from 9 years ago but if
> > you're examining funding, its probably going to start back there.
> >
> > Lisa.
> > --
> > Irish Linux Users' Group mailing list
> > About this list : http://mail.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug
> > Who we are : http://www.linux.ie/
> > Where we are : http://www.linux.ie/map/
> >
> --
> Irish Linux Users' Group mailing list
> About this list : http://mail.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug
> Who we are : http://www.linux.ie/
> Where we are : http://www.linux.ie/map/
>
--
--
More information about the ILUG
mailing list