[ILUG-Social] RE: [ILUG] Re:[OT] Commission seeks views on pr ivacy legislation

[Brian O'Donoghue]

Call it a great big fat lemon if you wish, but I have requested the
pertinant information from RTE, so that is the extent of what I can
reasonably do from my terminal right now, this you may regard as
insufficient, but if you wish to pick up my tab for the afternoon I will of
course satifsy your claims for more backup than hearsay on this matter.

Dispite the fact that this tangent has nothing to do with the topic, one
thing you do learn when modding is that people will take you up on almost
anything for any reason, thus instead of arguing the merits of lack thereof
of the topic in question said topic degenerates into nonesense claims for
recompense regarding proof (which I have already requested)

[Your not the
moderator here, AFAIK anyway. Where you taking debate lessons in school
possibly? Or]

Is this some sort of joke... the humour fails me... I'm sure it makes sense
to you, and no such discourse in discussion usually leads to kiddies with
their handbags, being surley and demanding 'information' in this instance
thus negating the possibility of loosing their argument and perhaps being
exposed to not being quite as infallable as they would like to think they
are, but that is just the opinion of this former mod not gospel.

[ are you possibly an aspiring politican? There's more than Irish
decendants on this list.]
yawn.


[Where is this public record? A pointer in the form of a URL will do me just
fine, thank you...]

Like I said I have asked RTE, RTE keeps records of it's broadcasts, thus
when one asks for records from a public body, those records 'assuming they
are available' are said to be public.
QED.

[blah blah blah]

Yes I'm sure again you think you are quite right, however there is an area
of divergence here, as I don't.